<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://au.sys-con.com"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Articles by Simon Phipps</title>
 <link>http://au.sys-con.com/</link>
 <description>Latest articles from Simon Phipps</description>
 <language>en</language>
 <copyright>Copyright 2009 </copyright>
 <generator></generator>
 <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:01:47 EST</lastBuildDate>
 <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
 <ttl>10</ttl>
<item>
 <title>i-Technology Viewpoint: &quot;The Network is the Computer and...Open Source is its Soul&quot; Says Simon Phipps</title>
 <link>http://au.sys-con.com/node/261119</link>
 <description>&#039;I&#039;m convinced that the reform that&#039;s needed is a root-and-branch reform of the very concept of the patent,&#039; contends Simon Phipps. Today&#039;s software patents, Phipps believes, breach the social contract on which the concept of a patent is based.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://au.sys-con.com/node/261119&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 06:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://au.sys-con.com/node/261119</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Will Companies Ever Make Money Off Open-Source?</title>
 <link>http://au.sys-con.com/node/46131</link>
 <description>The question &#039;How will Sun ever make money off giving so much  source-code to open source&#039; - as it did in 2000 with OpenOffice.org,  has most recently with Project Looking Glass and is about to again with  Solaris - is the wrong one, argues Sun&#039;s Simon Phipps. &#039;It&#039;s a good  question,&#039; he says, but at its heart - he argues - &#039;lies a  misunderstanding about the nature of open source software, and once  that&#039;s cleared up everything falls into place much more easily.&#039;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://au.sys-con.com/node/46131&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://au.sys-con.com/node/46131</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s About More Than Just the PlumbingThe Real Issues That Need to Be SolvedAre the Nontechnical Ones</title>
 <link>http://au.sys-con.com/node/39348</link>
 <description>I&#039;ve described elsewhere the idea of &#039;swarms&#039; - spontaneously federating devices and software services connecting over networks. Some people are now describing this concept as &#039;wireless Web services,&#039; extending the group of ideas now being called services-on-demand.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://au.sys-con.com/node/39348&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://au.sys-con.com/node/39348</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Snapshot of the Future</title>
 <link>http://au.sys-con.com/node/40807</link>
 <description>WBT is pleased to showcase some farseeing comments on the emerging new wireless Java world from our International Advisory Board member Simon Phipps, who filed the following article - wirelessly of course&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://au.sys-con.com/node/40807&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:20:00 EST</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://au.sys-con.com/node/40807</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Meaning, Not Markup</title>
 <link>http://au.sys-con.com/node/40037</link>
 <description>This article explores the paradox that sharing a common vocabulary can actually restrict the richness and nuances of a business paradigm.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://au.sys-con.com/node/40037&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://au.sys-con.com/node/40037</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Parallel Worlds</title>
 <link>http://au.sys-con.com/node/36325</link>
 <description>In the last few years the focus in computing has gradually moved away from the raw technology to settle on the total cost of ownership (tco) for a solution. What makes up the tco? That&#039;s hard to say, and everyone has a different answer, which usually depends on what they find easiest to fix. Most people agree that the tco isn&#039;t simply the sum of the prices of the parts that make the system, although it comes from those initially. A much greater cost arises from the cost of supporting the system in context.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://au.sys-con.com/node/36325&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://au.sys-con.com/node/36325</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More &quot;Doubletalk&quot; from Microsoft, Claims Simon PhippsA corrective to all the hype about C#</title>
 <link>http://au.sys-con.com/node/37228</link>
 <description>(October 25, 2002) - I&#039;m quoted by Gavin Clark of ComputerWire in his item (syndicated by The Register) about the standardization of Microsoft&#039;s C# programming language and their moves to make their C++ compiler catch up with the standards a little. My remarks there were a little truncated and consequently unclear, so I&#039;d like to elaborate a little.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://au.sys-con.com/node/37228&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://au.sys-con.com/node/37228</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
