Comments
yourfanat wrote: I am using another tool for Oracle developers - dbForge Studio for Oracle. This IDE has lots of usefull features, among them: oracle designer, code competion and formatter, query builder, debugger, profiler, erxport/import, reports and many others. The latest version supports Oracle 12C. More information here.
Cloud Expo on Google News
SYS-CON.TV
Cloud Expo & Virtualization 2009 East
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
IBM
Smarter Business Solutions Through Dynamic Infrastructure
IBM
Smarter Insights: How the CIO Becomes a Hero Again
Microsoft
Windows Azure
GOLD SPONSORS:
Appsense
Why VDI?
CA
Maximizing the Business Value of Virtualization in Enterprise and Cloud Computing Environments
ExactTarget
Messaging in the Cloud - Email, SMS and Voice
Freedom OSS
Stairway to the Cloud
Sun
Sun's Incubation Platform: Helping Startups Serve the Enterprise
POWER PANELS:
Cloud Computing & Enterprise IT: Cost & Operational Benefits
How and Why is a Flexible IT Infrastructure the Key To the Future?
Click For 2008 West
Event Webcasts
Linux.SYS-CON.com Opinion - Unix Vendors Will Need Soon to Abandon Ship
Is there a future for proprietary Unix? LinuxWorld Magazine?s James Turner thinks not.

(July 7, 2003) - Setting aside the legal conspiracy theories regarding Linux/Microsoft/SCO/IBM/The Trilateral Commission/The Freemasons, it’s becoming more and more pertinent to ask the question: what’s the future of commercial dialects of the Unix operating system?

This is an issue of more than passing concern for vendors such as Sun, who have staked their financial future on the combination of a hardware platform and a proprietary Unix version that runs on it. As Linux is ported to more and more platforms, end users now have a choice. Do I want to run Solaris on my Sun Fire Blade server, or Linux? AIX on my IBM pSeries 660, or Linux? The traditional argument that applications software wasn’t available for Linux is no longer true, since just about anything you would want from Oracle to J2EE is now Linux-friendly.

There are three main arguments for the continuing existence of proprietary Unix versions. First, hardware vendors can tune and customize their kernel to best leverage the power of their machine. To make a change to the Linux kernel, you either have to demonstrate that it’s of benefit to all, or arrange to have it optional so that it doesn't negatively effect the other platforms. You are also placing it into the open-source world, meaning that your enhancements might also benefit your competitors.

Offsetting this argument is the fact that hardware vendors aren’t always best at exploiting their own products. It’s a well known piece of history that gcc was a better C compiler than Sun’s commercial offering for Solaris, which led many developers to forego the expensive Sun compiler for the free one that produced better binaries. Similarly, Linux kernel developers have done a pretty good job at optimizing Linux for a variety of platforms, so it’s hard to believe that a proprietary operating system is going to be that much faster.

Secondly, the argument can be made that by buying your hardware and software from the same vendor, you cut down on support headaches and have a one-stop shopping experience. The reality, however, is that even inside a single vendor the software and hardware groups are essentially two different companies. The guy who comes out to fix your disk drive probably couldn’t patch a kernel bug if his RHCE certificate depended on it. Hardware is essentially a commodity item now. You buy the right piece of iron for your needs, and then plop whatever software you want on it.

The last argument is that buying a commercial release gives you a support channel, and someone to sue when things go wrong. But with Red Hat and SuSE offering enterprise versions of Linux complete with 24x7 support and corporate bank accounts to go after if something goes wrong, that argument is shot as well.

In my opinion, the true reality is this: the proprietary Unix market is a dwindling one, consisting mainly of customers who are already dedicated Solaris or AIX shops. As time goes by, the vendors will either transition into being pure hardware players, or go down with their sinking operating systems.

About James Turner
James Turner is president of Black Bear Software. James was formerly senior editor of Linux.SYS-CON.com and has also written for Wired, Christian Science Monitor, and other publications. He is currently working on his third book on open source development.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1

I see the linuxworld ostrich is hard at work with his head in the sand. Commercial Unix is still a much better alternative to linux for a wide variety of reasons. If we just stick to the basics like OS maximums, we see:

Unix SVR5 variants support up to 16GB of general purpose memory, and up to 64GB of Dedicated memory, linux only supports 4GB of general purpose memory. Unix has time proven journaling filesystems, linux has just got experimental versions of these. Unix has a fully threaded kernel, linux isn't even close.
The list goes on and on. Of course, if the linux developers keep up the pace of pirating, they could have most of this in a few years.
In the meantime, Unix is still by far the best option for businesses large and small who want a legitimate OS free of legal encumbrances.

Linux can't really scale on big SMPs now (it probably will eventually). Windows kills it on big boxes (see www.tpc.org) as does AIX an HP-UX. It lacks many reliability and management features that Windows and commercial UNIXes have, and the development environment is crude by modern standards. It offers great price-performance on up to 4way intel boxes and does a great job on clusters, as well.

Interesting article...


Your Feedback
devilsadvocate wrote: I see the linuxworld ostrich is hard at work with his head in the sand. Commercial Unix is still a much better alternative to linux for a wide variety of reasons. If we just stick to the basics like OS maximums, we see: Unix SVR5 variants support up to 16GB of general purpose memory, and up to 64GB of Dedicated memory, linux only supports 4GB of general purpose memory. Unix has time proven journaling filesystems, linux has just got experimental versions of these. Unix has a fully threaded kernel, linux isn't even close. The list goes on and on. Of course, if the linux developers keep up the pace of pirating, they could have most of this in a few years. In the meantime, Unix is still by far the best option for businesses large and small who want a legitimate OS free of legal encumbrances.
mike ferrell wrote: Linux can't really scale on big SMPs now (it probably will eventually). Windows kills it on big boxes (see www.tpc.org) as does AIX an HP-UX. It lacks many reliability and management features that Windows and commercial UNIXes have, and the development environment is crude by modern standards. It offers great price-performance on up to 4way intel boxes and does a great job on clusters, as well.
R wrote: Interesting article...
Latest Cloud Developer Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the ...
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, an...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potentia...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (Clo...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enter...
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021



SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
ADS BY GOOGLE