From the Blogosphere
When You Can't Squeeze Your App | @DevOpsSummit #DevOps #Microservices
It’s time to look to the network
By: Lori MacVittie
Jan. 25, 2016 10:00 AM
Developers are often caught between a rock and a hard place. They aren’t allowed to employ the tricks of the trade that can squeeze more performance out of their code because the consequences – technical debt stemming from impaired maintainability - are generally considered even worse. It’s not appropriate, for example, to use bit-shifting techniques to do simple multiplication because while it might be milliseconds faster, it isn’t always universally understood and thus can cause issues with long-term maintainability.
While we (developers) like to joke that “if it was hard to write it should be hard to read”, in the real world that’s not feasible. Coding standards exist to ensure some semblance of uniformity across time and developers and to reduce the time it takes to troubleshoot, modify, and enhance in the future.
So it is that optimization is often de-prioritized in favor of readability. Because until it matters, optimization doesn’t matter. Newcomer said it best:
There will undoubtedly, then, come a point in the balancing act between performance and maintainability where maintainability is going to win, even if the business demands more performance. That’s because performance has real business impacts.
Consider that “three hundred million dollars was spent to lay a high-speed fiber optic cable from the futures market in Chicago to the exchanges in New Jersey to improve the speed of stock trading (particularly high- frequency trading — HFT) by 3 milliseconds.” (What is worth 100 million per millisecond?)
That’s 100 million dollars per millisecond.
Now most organizations (like yours, probably )work in much bigger slices of time, like 100 milliseconds. A quick blink of your eye is 100 milliseconds. That still doesn’t seem like a lot, but it turns out that 100 milliseconds can actually be worth (many) millions.
And even if you’ve managed to squeeze every last millisecond out of code, you may still be underperforming. That’s because apps are not islands. They have to be deployed on platforms and operating systems. They have to use the networking stack that’s given to them, whether it’s optimized for their app or not.
And sometimes it isn’t. And sometimes it can’t be, because you don’t have the information you need. A classic example is the use of HTTP compression. In the right situation – over a low-bandwidth (WAN or mobile) connection – it can be instrumental in improving the performance of an app or web site as perceived by the end user. In the wrong situation – over a high-bandwidth (LAN) connection – it can actually degrade (yes, as in ‘make worse’) – the performance.
Going all in on either option means necessarily condemning one group of users to delays.
That’s why it’s sometimes important to move upstream, from the app and its assigned network stack, to the proxy in front of it to optimize for performance. Because its networking stack was designed to be tweaked. It was designed to be configured on a per-app basis and provide specific TCP and HTTP optimizations that boost the performance of apps and APIs alike. When it’s a full-proxy it can double-down on those optimizations by tweaking its separate networking stacks. It can leverage additional caching and provide offload capabilities that reduce the load on the apps and APIs themselves which in turn helps keep performance ideal.
Sometimes there’s just nothing more a dev – or a DevOps – can do to squeeze out another 100 milliseconds from the app, API, or its app infrastructure. When that happens, it’s time to look upstream, to the proxy, to provide the boost the business needs.
Latest Cloud Developer Stories
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
Most Read This Week