Comments
yourfanat wrote: I am using another tool for Oracle developers - dbForge Studio for Oracle. This IDE has lots of usefull features, among them: oracle designer, code competion and formatter, query builder, debugger, profiler, erxport/import, reports and many others. The latest version supports Oracle 12C. More information here.
Cloud Expo on Google News
SYS-CON.TV
Cloud Expo & Virtualization 2009 East
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
IBM
Smarter Business Solutions Through Dynamic Infrastructure
IBM
Smarter Insights: How the CIO Becomes a Hero Again
Microsoft
Windows Azure
GOLD SPONSORS:
Appsense
Why VDI?
CA
Maximizing the Business Value of Virtualization in Enterprise and Cloud Computing Environments
ExactTarget
Messaging in the Cloud - Email, SMS and Voice
Freedom OSS
Stairway to the Cloud
Sun
Sun's Incubation Platform: Helping Startups Serve the Enterprise
POWER PANELS:
Cloud Computing & Enterprise IT: Cost & Operational Benefits
How and Why is a Flexible IT Infrastructure the Key To the Future?
Click For 2008 West
Event Webcasts
"We Have To Work Together For The Greater Good," Says Sun Exec as Sun Joins WS-I
"We Have To Work Together For The Greater Good," Says Sun Exec as Sun Joins WS-I

(October 29, 2002) - This past week, in a move that some have characterized as a u-turn, Sun Microsystems joined the Web Services Interoperability Organization (WS-I) as a contributing member. Previously, Sun declined joining the WS-I unless it would be given equal status with WS-I's nine founding companies, which include IBM; HP; Intel; SAP; Oracle; Fujitsu; Accenture; BEA; and Sun's rival, Microsoft. Now that the WS-I has opened up two more seats to the board, Sun is betting on the possibility that they'll gain a board seat next March. Ed Julson, director of Industry Alliances and Standards, Sun Microsystems, gave us Sun's point of view on this decision in an exclusive interview.

JDJ-IN: What most influenced Sun to join WS-I at this time?

Ed Julson: Sun has always been supportive of the need to do Web services interoperability work. Where we have had issues is with the WS-I governance model. The recent WS-I decision to add two seats to the board now make it possible for Sun to join WS-I and contribute at a level we feel is appropriate.

Even though the election doesn't take place until next March, we are joining now to meet certain membership and election criteria as defined in the WS-I bylaws.

JDJ-IN: Ariba, Cisco Systems, IONA Technologies, KPMG International, Novell, Reed Business Information, Reuters, Tibco, VeriSign, and WebMethods have also expressed interest in becoming board members in the WS-I. What do you believe Sun's chances are to be elected onto the WS-I board?

Ed: I don't believe there's any company in the industry better suited to this role than Sun. We have a proven track record in standards, and a long history as an innovator in network computing. Our work in the Java community promoting open standards, and our experience building TCK's and AVK's for Java platform compatability gives Sun unique insight into what it takes to design interoperable software. In addition, there's work we can leverage from our involvement with SOAPbuilders, a SOAP interoperability forum.

JDJ-IN: Forrester analyst Ted Schadler earlier characterized Sun as "the overachieving teenager who is not quite ready to give up independence," when compared to the "grownups" of WS-I such as IBM, SAP, and Microsoft. Do you see Sun's joining of WS-I in any way compromising Sun's independence?

Ed: Not at all. Sun is currently active in a wide variety of industry forums and standards bodies. We are fierce competitors with many of the companies we work with in these forums and that we will be working with at WS-I. However, in order to grow the overall market and enable technology adoption, sometimes we have to work together for the greater good. WS-I is an example of one of those situations.

JDJ-IN: Are there specific issues that Sun would like to see the WS-I address regarding Web services and Java? Does Sun anticipate the WS-I having influence on the direction of Java?

Ed: The WS std's stack has become way too complex, with too many overlapping specifications. This complexity is now a major inhibitor to Web services adoption and needs to be addressed.

It is Sun's intent to work within standards bodies, such as the W3C and OASIS to converge overlapping specifications and then align this work with the WS-I interoperability profiles and the Java platform.

The next round of WS-I profiles will be significantly more complex to develop than the current profiles, and Sun wants to make sure that all relevant specifications are consider for this work, not just a favored few.

And finally, we are committed to royalty free technologies and governance processes that result in truly open organizations.

About Java News Desk
JDJ News Desk monitors the world of Java to present IT professionals with updates on technology advances, business trends, new products and standards in the Java and i-technology space.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1

Think Sun just realized they missed the webservices standards train and it's going down the tracks with or w/o them. (I think this is a rude awakening and probably the realization that they're not the center of the universe for development - nor do I consider anyone else to be as well.)

I'm a little confused with the verbage 'compromizing & independence'. I'd categorize the development of the Java language just as uncompromizing, independent AND proprietary as Microsoft's VB evolution.

If they really wanted to be open, compromizing and dependent (as in common standards), they'd hand over the Java language to the ECMA & OSI groups like Microsoft did with C#. (You still have enough time to catch the next train at this point.)

Maybe this organization can become legitimate now

On your knees is becoming a way of life ... beware the life of a midget

Go Sun Go!


Your Feedback
Rob K wrote: Think Sun just realized they missed the webservices standards train and it's going down the tracks with or w/o them. (I think this is a rude awakening and probably the realization that they're not the center of the universe for development - nor do I consider anyone else to be as well.) I'm a little confused with the verbage 'compromizing & independence'. I'd categorize the development of the Java language just as uncompromizing, independent AND proprietary as Microsoft's VB evolution. If they really wanted to be open, compromizing and dependent (as in common standards), they'd hand over the Java language to the ECMA & OSI groups like Microsoft did with C#. (You still have enough time to catch the next train at this point.)
JohnH wrote: Maybe this organization can become legitimate now
waynecrooks wrote: On your knees is becoming a way of life ... beware the life of a midget
waynecrooks wrote:
XML Dude wrote: Go Sun Go!
Latest Cloud Developer Stories
Digital Transformation: Preparing Cloud & IoT Security for the Age of Artificial Intelligence. As automation and artificial intelligence (AI) power solution development and delivery, many businesses need to build backend cloud capabilities. Well-poised organizations, marketing sm...
Daniel Jones is CTO of EngineerBetter, helping enterprises deliver value faster. Previously he was an IT consultant, indie video games developer, head of web development in the finance sector, and an award-winning martial artist. Continuous Delivery makes it possible to exploit f...
To Really Work for Enterprises, MultiCloud Adoption Requires Far Better and Inclusive Cloud Monitoring and Cost Management … But How? Overwhelmingly, even as enterprises have adopted cloud computing and are expanding to multi-cloud computing, IT leaders remain concerned about how...
"Calligo is a cloud service provider with data privacy at the heart of what we do. We are a typical Infrastructure as a Service cloud provider but it's been designed around data privacy," explained Julian Box, CEO and co-founder of Calligo, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cl...
Poor data quality and analytics drive down business value. In fact, Gartner estimated that the average financial impact of poor data quality on organizations is $9.7 million per year. But bad data is much more than a cost center. By eroding trust in information, analytics and the...
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021



SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
ADS BY GOOGLE