Comments
bruce.armstrong wrote: Somebody just said it better than I did, and with more chops to say it: Open Letter to Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg & Facebook Mobile
Cloud Expo on Google News

SYS-CON.TV
Cloud Expo & Virtualization 2009 East
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
IBM
Smarter Business Solutions Through Dynamic Infrastructure
IBM
Smarter Insights: How the CIO Becomes a Hero Again
Microsoft
Windows Azure
GOLD SPONSORS:
Appsense
Why VDI?
CA
Maximizing the Business Value of Virtualization in Enterprise and Cloud Computing Environments
ExactTarget
Messaging in the Cloud - Email, SMS and Voice
Freedom OSS
Stairway to the Cloud
Sun
Sun's Incubation Platform: Helping Startups Serve the Enterprise
POWER PANELS:
Cloud Computing & Enterprise IT: Cost & Operational Benefits
How and Why is a Flexible IT Infrastructure the Key To the Future?
Click For 2008 West
Event Webcasts
Debian Founder Proposes New Type of Distro: "Componentized Linux"
Debian Founder Proposes New Type of Distro: "Componentized Linux"

Debian founder Ian Murdock has been blogging about a subject very dear to his heart.

In his blog - titled Toward a new kind of "Linux distribution" - Murdock acknowledges that that Linux distributions "have played a central role - arguably the central role - in the evolution of Linux from hobby project to mainstream technology" but points out that distros are "merely convenient packaging around a loosely knit collection of thousands of independently developed technologies" whereas their proprietary OS cousins "contain technologies developed (or licensed) by a single organization to fit into a single, integrated product."

This difference, Murdock, believes, is putting Linux at a disadvantage.

"For the commercial Linux-as-product distributors, it is a sensible strategy to portray their distributions as monolithic wholes, as this allows them to position the distributions as platforms unto themselves and, thus, pursue traditional OS business models based on locking users in to a platform (I've argued before this will be a losing strategy in the long run, but that's another topic).

However, for those who view Linux not as a product but as a platform on which to build their own products, the monolithic nature of the typical distribution is a particularly bad fit. The typical Linux-as-product distribution optimizes for breadth - because it is "one-size-fits-all", it needs to include a huge assortment of features and technologies to satisfy the widest possible audience, only a few of which may be important to any given project (and the few that are important will always vary). Ideally, for Linux-as-platform users, a distribution should optimize for depth, i.e., to excel in those few features and technologies important to the project at hand. "

In Murdock's view, a new kind of distribution is therefore needed to allow optimization for depth, a "componentized" distribution from which users may build platforms from the bottom up, including only the features and technologies their products require.

As co-founder, chairman, and chief strategist of Progeny, Murdock reveals in his blog that Progeny is building just such a distribution. "We are building it in the open as a community project in the hopes that others will be intrigued with the concept, collaborate with us on the component infrastructure and underlying open-source technologies (Anaconda, APT, etc.) and ultimately build their own components too," Murdock writes.

"If this sounds a lot like Debian," he adds, "that's because it is in many ways: the end result is more of a collection of software than a distribution, and we hope the open development process ends up fostering the same kind of inextricable developer community that has sprung up around Debian."

This "componentized Linux" does differ from Debian though in one important respect, explains Murdock:

"Importantly, the componentized Linux is a layer above an existing distribution - or, more properly, above an existing collection of packages. Our components are currently based on Debian sarge, and we are planning to support Fedora-based components as well in time. Our LSB 1.3-certified core runtime is available today. More components and a component-aware, Anaconda-based installation mechanism will be added in the coming weeks."

About Linux News Desk
SYS-CON's Linux News Desk gathers stories, analysis, and information from around the Linux world and synthesizes them into an easy to digest format for IT/IS managers and other business decision-makers.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1

Great!
Best Wishes.

each debian package is hard to classify. good luck!

Talking about Puzzles, and componentized Linux may be you can look at Tangram Linux: www.cogniware.net/tangram-linux (spanish version only)

Talking about Puzzles, and componentized Linux may be you can look at Tangram Linux: www.cogniware.net/tangram-linux (spanish version only)

We are now trying to build the pieces of the puzzle.

It's not easy to classify each debian package, assigning them to a block (Desktop, Servers, Entertainment...). It's not easy even to define the main blocks !

I wonder if a "democratic" system would do the work. Imagine a webpage where users could vote for a package to be included in a distro, or in a block... mmmm... curious, isn't it ?

;-)

I see the advantages of components! That would make it easier to distribute e.g. server that are optimized for certain apps. e.g. Linux, Eclipse, MySQL, Tomcat, Cocoon -> You have a runtime, a server, a db, a publishing framework all in one and it is only 500 MB! Nice! I like the idea!
King regards

You say he's the 'ian' in Debian but don't forget that it is his wife Debra who is the 'deb' in debian.

I'd always felt that this is how Linux really works the best, rather than being a giant 1 gig hunk of software, I can pick and choose the parts I want to play with. This leads to lots of mistakes early on, but over time, you learn how to optimize and reevaluate what you need and where, with the end result of understanding your system that much better. So my question is: Was this a suggestion for Linux in general, or a suggestion for a new type of business model?


Your Feedback
Zoue wrote: Great! Best Wishes.
muscle wrote: each debian package is hard to classify. good luck!
Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: Talking about Puzzles, and componentized Linux may be you can look at Tangram Linux: www.cogniware.net/tangram-linux (spanish version only)
Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: Talking about Puzzles, and componentized Linux may be you can look at Tangram Linux: www.cogniware.net/tangram-linux (spanish version only)
Alfonso E.M. wrote: We are now trying to build the pieces of the puzzle. It's not easy to classify each debian package, assigning them to a block (Desktop, Servers, Entertainment...). It's not easy even to define the main blocks ! I wonder if a "democratic" system would do the work. Imagine a webpage where users could vote for a package to be included in a distro, or in a block... mmmm... curious, isn't it ? ;-)
Thorsten wrote: I see the advantages of components! That would make it easier to distribute e.g. server that are optimized for certain apps. e.g. Linux, Eclipse, MySQL, Tomcat, Cocoon -> You have a runtime, a server, a db, a publishing framework all in one and it is only 500 MB! Nice! I like the idea! King regards
Debwatch wrote: You say he's the 'ian' in Debian but don't forget that it is his wife Debra who is the 'deb' in debian.
AlexanderYoshi wrote: I'd always felt that this is how Linux really works the best, rather than being a giant 1 gig hunk of software, I can pick and choose the parts I want to play with. This leads to lots of mistakes early on, but over time, you learn how to optimize and reevaluate what you need and where, with the end result of understanding your system that much better. So my question is: Was this a suggestion for Linux in general, or a suggestion for a new type of business model?
Latest Cloud Developer Stories
There’s no substitute for experience. If you could learn from the successes and failures of an early enterprise cloud pioneer, your own cloud journey could avoid similar pitfalls and perhaps reap faster rewards. Years ago, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia made the strategic dec...
Whatever your course, meet Cloud complexity head on with a unified approach to handle extreme performance, reliability, availability, and simplicity. In her session at the 10th International Cloud Expo, Ayalla Goldschmidt, Senior Director of Product Marketing at Oracle, will re...
Oracle Wednesday said it’s buying privately held Vitrue for some unsung amount of money. Vitrue operates a cloud-based social marketing and engagement platform that lets marketers centrally create, publish, moderate, manage, measure and report on their social marketing campaign...
SAP on Tuesday announced its intention to buy Ariba for $4.3 billion, a 19 percent premium on Ariba's market capitalization. The move comes soon after SAP's SuccessFactors February buy and shows that SAP is quickly and aggressively acquiring its way to a full cloud business serv...
With Cloud Expo 2012 New York (10th Cloud Expo) now under three weeks away, what better time to introduce you in greater detail to the distinguished individuals in our incredible Speaker Faculty for the technical and strategy sessions at the conference...
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021

SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
ADS BY GOOGLE

Breaking Cloud Computing News

CSC (NYSE: CSC) today announced that it is deploying Cisco’s Intelligent Automation...