Comments
Richard Davies wrote: The UK has a good crop of technology pioneers in cloud computing - for example ElasticHosts, FlexiScale, Flexiant, OnApp - and also some strong government initiatives such as G-Cloud. We will have to see whether this kind of technical leadership converts into swift mass-market adoption or not.
Cloud Expo on Google News

SYS-CON.TV
Cloud Expo & Virtualization 2009 East
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
IBM
Smarter Business Solutions Through Dynamic Infrastructure
IBM
Smarter Insights: How the CIO Becomes a Hero Again
Microsoft
Windows Azure
GOLD SPONSORS:
Appsense
Why VDI?
CA
Maximizing the Business Value of Virtualization in Enterprise and Cloud Computing Environments
ExactTarget
Messaging in the Cloud - Email, SMS and Voice
Freedom OSS
Stairway to the Cloud
Sun
Sun's Incubation Platform: Helping Startups Serve the Enterprise
POWER PANELS:
Cloud Computing & Enterprise IT: Cost & Operational Benefits
How and Why is a Flexible IT Infrastructure the Key To the Future?
Click For 2008 West
Event Webcasts
Microsoft + SAP: The Acquisition That Never Happened
Microsoft + SAP: The Acquisition That Never Happened

In one of those strange ironies beloved of the business and technology world, the primary reason given for why Microsoft and SAP didn't end up as one company, despite Microsoft having taken a close look at such a prospect earlier this year...is that it would have proved too difficult to integrate the two businesses.

So much for The Age of Business Integration and all the software sold worldwide to support it.

Secret talks between the two companies apparently began late last year but ceased a few months ago "due to the complexity of the potential transaction and subsequent integration," Microsoft said yesterday in a statement.

Had Microsoft bought SAP the result would have been an 80,000-strong worldwide workforce, compared to IBM's 255,000. SAP has a market cap of nearly $50 billion.

Cynics are already speculating that it was a no-lose move by MS since now the entire world's ERP vendors, knowing that Microsoft "nearly acquired" SAP, will now fall over themselves to program .NET interoperability into their ERP packages to make themselves more attractive to MS for buyout - giving the Redmond-based company a helping hand in its fight for market share in the enterprise computing market.

Microsoft has already bought two of SAP's rivals in billion-dollar acquisitions - Great Plains Software, which it acquired for $1.1 BN in 2001 and Navision, which it bought for $1.3 BN the following year. The disclosure about MS having opened talks with SAP arose in connection with the US Justice Department's antitrust suit aimed at blocking Oracle's proposed takeover of PeopleSoft. Oracle's argument is that it gives the lie to Microsoft's contention that it only has designs on SMBs, but not full-fledged enterprise customers. Which in turn is why Oracle should be allowed to go ahead, says its lawyers.

In answer to the inevitable question as to whether any Microsoft + SAP deal would have been billed as an "acquisition" or a "merger," a joke has already begun doing the rounds of Interner message boards:

Q: What do you get when you merge Microsoft and SAP?
A: Microsoft. 

 

About SAP News Desk
SAP News Desk trawls the world's news information sources and brings you timely updates on the world's leading provider of enterprise resource planning (ERP) and its various software product lines used to integrate back-office functions such as distribution, accounting, human resources, and manufacturing.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1

Once Oracle went after PeopleSoft, it was pretty much inevitable that Microsoft would at least start looking at SAP.

There''s an article in the London-based Financial Times that says:

"Microsoft says the discussions were halted due to the complexity involved in the transaction and in integrating the two companies. A merger with SAP would be a profound break with previous Microsoft strategy, and would likely have raised eyebrows among regulators."

What little experience I have had with SAP is that it is the king of archaic over-priced bloatware. Microsoft would have choked and died attempting to absorb it. This would have gotten rid of two ugly giant blights on the industry at once. Too bad it didn''t go through.

After eyeing up SAP for a year or two Microsoft plucks up the courage and asks SAP for a date.. they both have dinner together in a fancy restaurant but conversation is dull and they avoid eye contact all night, SAP looks bored, Microsoft eyes up the waitress all night while SAP eyes up the bartender.

Microsoft pays the bill and SAP contributes to the tip.
Both go home alone, end of story.

I''ve always had the impression that the policy from Redmond was to find the "sweet spot" for their back office applications. In this case, the best target is probably a notch or two down from the customers who are willing to bay a SAP solution.

Whatever the reasons might be, MS in fact went ahead and bought Navision Financials instead, which probably was better for the overall backoffice strategy.

//Wegge


Your Feedback
rewt66 wrote: Once Oracle went after PeopleSoft, it was pretty much inevitable that Microsoft would at least start looking at SAP.
IT Complexity wrote: There''s an article in the London-based Financial Times that says: "Microsoft says the discussions were halted due to the complexity involved in the transaction and in integrating the two companies. A merger with SAP would be a profound break with previous Microsoft strategy, and would likely have raised eyebrows among regulators."
samantha wrote: What little experience I have had with SAP is that it is the king of archaic over-priced bloatware. Microsoft would have choked and died attempting to absorb it. This would have gotten rid of two ugly giant blights on the industry at once. Too bad it didn''t go through.
TrueLove wrote: After eyeing up SAP for a year or two Microsoft plucks up the courage and asks SAP for a date.. they both have dinner together in a fancy restaurant but conversation is dull and they avoid eye contact all night, SAP looks bored, Microsoft eyes up the waitress all night while SAP eyes up the bartender. Microsoft pays the bill and SAP contributes to the tip. Both go home alone, end of story.
Wegge wrote: I''ve always had the impression that the policy from Redmond was to find the "sweet spot" for their back office applications. In this case, the best target is probably a notch or two down from the customers who are willing to bay a SAP solution. Whatever the reasons might be, MS in fact went ahead and bought Navision Financials instead, which probably was better for the overall backoffice strategy. //Wegge
Latest Cloud Developer Stories
Swisscom, the Swiss telecom, is going into the cloud business. Its subsidiary Swisscom IT Services AG has signed up with Red Hat as a Certified Cloud Provider and launched a public cloud Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud targeting enterprise-class customers primarily in ...
Apache Deltacloud, the Red Hat-contributed ReSTful API that abstracts differences between clouds so services on any cloud can be managed – provided of course there’s a driver – has graduated from the Apache Foundation’s incubator and is now a full-fledged Top-Level Project (TLP)....
In a surprise move on Tuesday, January 10, Oracle wheeled out its Big Data Appliance. That’s the one it said in October would be ready sometime in the first half. Only nobody believed it meant early in the first half. Heck, it’s not even clear anybody thought Oracle could make ...
Rackspace Hosting, the service leader in cloud computing, on Thursday announced its acquisition of SharePoint911, an industry leader in SharePoint consulting, training, and "JumpStart" services within SharePoint. The unification of both companies provides capabilities to deliver ...
CloudLinux, Inc., on Thursday released CafeFS 3, a virtualized file system for shared hosters that cages each customer within its own virtualized file system. CageFS becomes part of CloudLinux OS at no additional charge. CloudLinux OS, the only commercially-supported Linux OS m...
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021

SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
ADS BY GOOGLE

Breaking Cloud Computing News
As client demand for engagements increases, Revel Consulting (www.revelconsulting.com), a Kirkland, ...