Comments
Richard Davies wrote: The UK has a good crop of technology pioneers in cloud computing - for example ElasticHosts, FlexiScale, Flexiant, OnApp - and also some strong government initiatives such as G-Cloud. We will have to see whether this kind of technical leadership converts into swift mass-market adoption or not.
Cloud Expo on Google News

SYS-CON.TV
Cloud Expo & Virtualization 2009 East
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
IBM
Smarter Business Solutions Through Dynamic Infrastructure
IBM
Smarter Insights: How the CIO Becomes a Hero Again
Microsoft
Windows Azure
GOLD SPONSORS:
Appsense
Why VDI?
CA
Maximizing the Business Value of Virtualization in Enterprise and Cloud Computing Environments
ExactTarget
Messaging in the Cloud - Email, SMS and Voice
Freedom OSS
Stairway to the Cloud
Sun
Sun's Incubation Platform: Helping Startups Serve the Enterprise
POWER PANELS:
Cloud Computing & Enterprise IT: Cost & Operational Benefits
How and Why is a Flexible IT Infrastructure the Key To the Future?
Click For 2008 West
Event Webcasts
Does Java Patents Case Affect Microsoft Too?
Does Java Patents Case Affect Microsoft Too?

Microsoft is a licensee of US Patent Trademark Office patents numbered 5226161, 5206951, and 5421012, the Eastman Kodak Co. confirmed yesterday, seemingly ending speculation - in the wake of Kodak's victory in its patent infringement suit against Sun - that perhaps IBM, HP, and Microsoft would be the next companies taken to court over the Kodak-patented way for a piece of software to "ask for help" from another application. A method that not only Java but also .NET relies on heavily, since it is more or less the keystone to OO programming.

Eastman Kodak purchased the patents in question from Wang Laboratories in 1997 when it bought Wang's imaging software business for $260 million and is now looking for restitution in the damages part of the trial against Sun to the tune of $1.06 billion in past royalties - which Kodak's lawyers calculate represents half of Sun's operating profit from the sales of computer servers and storage equipment between January 1998 and June 2001.

Patent 5206951 covers the integration of data between typed objects by mutual, direct invocation between object managers corresponding to object types.

Patent 5421012 covers multitasking computer system for integrating the operation of different application programs which manipulate data objects of different types.

And Patent 5226161 covers integration of data between typed data structures by mutual direct invocation between data managers corresponding to data types

A spokesman for Kodak said on Friday, as a federal jury found in its favor: "Kodak has and continues to make substantial technology investments to ensure high-quality products. We are pleased that the court has validated Kodak's intellectual property rights protecting these valuable innovations."

Microsoft .NET developers will be relieved to hear that they do not face the same kind of litigation from Kodak. $1.06 billion is more than just chump change, even for Redmond.

About .NETDJ News Desk
.NETDJ News Desk monitors Microsoft .NET and its related technologies, including Silverlight, to present IT professionals with news, updates on technology advances, business trends, new products and standards, and insight.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1

MSFT isn't worried because they already license the patents. Kodak is just doing what the broken patent system demands that they do. Finally, Sun "only" had to pay $92M for the rights, not the billion initially mentioned.

This is ridiculous,unfair and unethical... patenting OOP concepts and then charging royalties, the courts should not have allowed this, its seting a bad prescedent, KODAK sucks, MICROSOFT SUCKS BIG TIME, BTW why do .NET developers not have to worry about law suits being filed, do they not use OOP concepts in .NET (which wouldnt surprise me ;)

It's something like if I patent the way the cars advance with four tires. The patents owned by Kodak are universal concepts of OOP.

It certainly reflects poorly on PTO to assign patents for concepts that have for long been part of the educational package in operating systems, concurrent systems and real-time systems.
Just look for instance at the work of C.A.R. Hoare in the mid 70's (CSP, ...)

I like the fact Sun have been got but I dont think such fundamental concepts should be patentable in the first place.

It's about time Sun gets a taste of there own medicine. They been chasing Microsoft around with silly lawsuits for years. Good for you Kodak!

Common, this is silly. Kodak, the dying company wants to make a lot of money of something it never knew they owned!
Please correct me people but isn't this unfair?


Your Feedback
David wrote: MSFT isn't worried because they already license the patents. Kodak is just doing what the broken patent system demands that they do. Finally, Sun "only" had to pay $92M for the rights, not the billion initially mentioned.
Carl wrote: This is ridiculous,unfair and unethical... patenting OOP concepts and then charging royalties, the courts should not have allowed this, its seting a bad prescedent, KODAK sucks, MICROSOFT SUCKS BIG TIME, BTW why do .NET developers not have to worry about law suits being filed, do they not use OOP concepts in .NET (which wouldnt surprise me ;)
JESUS wrote: It's something like if I patent the way the cars advance with four tires. The patents owned by Kodak are universal concepts of OOP.
Renrew wrote: It certainly reflects poorly on PTO to assign patents for concepts that have for long been part of the educational package in operating systems, concurrent systems and real-time systems. Just look for instance at the work of C.A.R. Hoare in the mid 70's (CSP, ...)
Nigel wrote: I like the fact Sun have been got but I dont think such fundamental concepts should be patentable in the first place.
Randy wrote: It's about time Sun gets a taste of there own medicine. They been chasing Microsoft around with silly lawsuits for years. Good for you Kodak!
Mehdi wrote: Common, this is silly. Kodak, the dying company wants to make a lot of money of something it never knew they owned! Please correct me people but isn't this unfair?
Latest Cloud Developer Stories
Can you bring services from the cloud to your customers faster and have them adopt it with ease of use or bring the power of bundled services to the fingertips of your clients without creating new rigid ‘apps stove pipes'? Do you want to prevent your business running away to publ...
OCZ Technology Group, a provider of high-performance solid-state drives (SSDs) for computing devices and systems, on Tuesday announced the Z-Drive R4 CloudServ PCI Express (PCIe) flash storage solution, designed to accelerate cloud computing applications and reduce operating expe...
Many organizations have embraced, or are considering, the benefits of cloud computing – speed, flexibility, increased expertise, shared workload, reduced costs, etc. The benefits are many – but so are the risks. What are the threats to cloud security? Which parties assume respons...
In August 2011, SHI Enterprise Solutions (ESS) division launched the SHI Cloud, offering reliable and cost-effective industrial-grade cloud computing platforms. That same division achieved an 82 percent increase in revenue over 2010.
SoftLayer Technologies on Tuesday announced the immediate worldwide availability of SoftLayer Object Storage, a redundant and highly scalable cloud storage service that allows users to easily store, search and retrieve data across the Internet, with optional CDN connectivity, or ...
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021

SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
ADS BY GOOGLE